Tell people that a Guardian columnist whose videos get tens of millions viewers clearly explains geoism in this video.

While governments continue bickering over a climate solution, the private sector is working to mitigate the impacts of climate change.

The Earth has been given a chance to heal in front of our eyes over the past few weeks during the global economic shutdown.

A continuous drive to improve upon our foundation of knowledge adds to the motivation that progresses our species.

The health of the planet is very important. We can and must do better for the future generations.

Fears and mistaken ideas are about to create an environmental disaster in California.

Economics, like other sciences, does not change. The principles of prosperity are eternal.

Powerful people with limited values tell us losing pristine nature is good for us. How can we tell when it’s not?

Economist Fred Harrison talks with conservationist Peter Smith about how the economy produces environmental disasters, and what solutions can create a environmental sustainability.

Target the most sensitive body part—the wallet. Make prices tell the truth. Earth as object of speculation? Not with geonomics.

Cities cater to cars, not people. New fuels, motors, and modes of transport all pale beside fewer, shorter trips.

You want efficient buildings yet you tax them—improving them raises their tax liability. How rational is that? Not very. So do something else!

Subsidized water does not benefit us, because we pay in higher rent and land value.

Solutions resembling nature's organic patterns are needed to solve society's problems.

The knee-jerk ideas won't suffice. Big problems need big solutions—powerful, big-picture solutions. Like geonomics.

People worsen droughts, yet we could avoid them and keep the food coming from dry regions sustainably.

Radio Interview KPFA Terra Verde with Paul Ehrlich, author of The Population Bomb, and Martin Adams, author of Land: A New Paradigm for a Thriving World

Until the value of nature is shared, humanity will continue to destroy nature in an effort to prolong its own existence.

Billions of dollars will go to the chiefs of the less developed economies, with little benefit to the people of these economies, while much deforestation will continue anyway.

Pollution control is mandatory if humanity is to survive, but the way that governments world-wide are going about it is astonishingly insane